⚡ This is your brand? Claim your page free and bring it to life on AI search.
Chart understanding is crucial for applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to tasks like analyzing scientific papers and financial reports. However, current datasets often use simplified charts with template-based questions, leading to overly optimistic progress assessments. We introduce CharXiv, an evaluation suite with 2,323 diverse and challenging charts from scientific papers. CharXiv includes two question types: (1) descriptive questions on basic chart elements and (2) reasoning questions requiring synthesis of complex visual information. Human experts curated and verified all charts and questions. Our findings show a significant gap in reasoning skills, with the strongest proprietary model (GPT-4o) achieving 47.1% accuracy and the best open-source model (InternVL Chat V1.5)
Category: Technology
charxiv.github.io1
Structured Data
8
Content Structure
5
Entity Clarity
2
E-E-A-T Signals
6
Technical AEO
4
AI Discoverability
Is this your brand?
Claim your free page to manage and improve your AI visibility score.
Tech buyers are the most research-intensive shoppers on the internet.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for CharXiv.
Scored by Engagemii on May 29, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/charxiv-github-io
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for CharXiv." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/charxiv-github-io
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - AI Brand Discovery and AEO Platform