AI Scores / Media & Publishing
AI Visibility Scores for Media and Publishing Brands
AI engines increasingly cite media sources in their answers. The publishers that get cited have strong E-E-A-T signals, clear author credentials, and structured article data. See how media brands score.
Score Distribution - 2,149,329 Media & Publishing Brands
Only <1% of media & publishing brands are AI-ready.
The other >99% are being skipped by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.
2,149,329 brands scored - page 49 of 21,494
Want to improve your AI visibility score?
Read: AEO guide for Media & Publishing brands →What an AEO score of 3.8/10 means for media & publishing brands
The average Media & Publishing brand we've scored sits at 3.8/10. That means roughly <1% are positioned to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while the remaining >99% are at risk of being skipped when AI engines answer customer questions.
Common AEO issues in media & publishing
- Missing Organization JSON-LD with sameAs links to social profiles
- No llms.txt file declaring the brand to AI crawlers
- FAQ content rendered without FAQPage schema, so AI engines cannot extract it
- robots.txt or Cloudflare WAF blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot
- Thin About pages with no founder/team Person schema
How to improve your media & publishing AEO score
Run a free AEO score for your site and see exactly which signals are missing. The audit takes under a minute and the fix list ships as a one-click JSON-LD + llms.txt + robots.txt patch you can paste into any platform.