AI Scores / Tech & SaaS

Tech & SaaS AI Scores
Score Your Brand Free
πŸ’»

AI Visibility Scores for Tech and SaaS Brands

B2B buyers ask AI engines for software recommendations every day. The SaaS brands that show up have schema markup, entity clarity, and AI-accessible documentation. See how tech companies score on AI visibility.

1,463,117
Brands Scored
4.5/10
Industry Average
<1%
AI-Ready (8+)

Score Distribution - 1,463,117 Tech & SaaS Brands

AI-Ready8-10
<1%
5,649
Getting There6-7
14%
210,135
Needs Work4-5
70%
1,021,774
Not Discoverable0-3
15%
225,559

Only <1% of tech & saas brands are AI-ready.

The other >99% are being skipped by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.

Score your brand free

1,463,117 brands scored - page 12694 of 14,632

R

Rina Foygel Barber

3/10
S

Scraps

3/10
D

Directory listing for ia803201.us.archive.orgHamburger iconInternet Archive logoWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconDonate iconUser iconUpload iconSearch iconSearch iconDonate icon

3/10
J

jMock

3/10
S

SheetJS

3/10
T

Thomson Reuters Developer Portal

3/10
B

Boris Ivanovic

3/10
C

CodeAbbey

3/10
W

Weixin Open Platform

3/10
P

Plasma Chain Mainnet Explorer

3/10
U

Uptime Kuma

3/10
T

Tanium Resource CenterZoomin_LogoAlert

3/10
M

Monitor Website Changes for Competitor Insights

3/10
P

Performance Budget Calculator

3/10
L

Luvit.io

3/10
C

Chris Ball (cjb)

3/10
C

CSPR.live

3/10
M

Musing Mortoray

3/10
A

async

3/10
S

Strophe

3/10
R

Rcpp

3/10
H

Harmony Website Management

3/10
A

azu.github.io

3/10
G

Gratipay

3/10
S

Small Carnivore Distributions

3/10
A

Asunder

3/10
H

Home

3/10
H

Hax's Homepage @ GitHub

3/10
N

nerfstudioContentsMenuExpandLight modeDark modeAuto light/dark mode

3/10
F

Front

3/10
S

Self

3/10
B

Bleve

3/10
M

Members of Royal Photographic Society

3/10
G

GraphQL

3/10
A

Apache Syncope

3/10
A

Afrimapr

3/10
M

markmap

3/10
L

Lumia | The Only Full Cycle RWA Chain

3/10
A

Abella

3/10
Q

Quentin Caudron

3/10
L

lists.denx.de Mailing Lists

3/10
H

Haus Sonnenspitze

3/10
T

TRIGGERcmd: Remotely run commands on your computers.

3/10
S

SOOS

3/10
I

Ivark.github.io

3/10
C

CI tests β€” reproducible

3/10
H

HELICS

3/10
T

TinyFaces πŸ‘¦πŸΌπŸ‘¨πŸΎπŸ‘©πŸ»

3/10
I

Is it maintained?

3/10
D

Darwinia

3/10
W

Welcome to Flow β€” Flow 0.3.0 documentation

3/10
F

Folioscope

3/10
W

webcloudGitHubBlueskyLinkedIn

3/10
A

About Nutils

3/10
β˜†

β˜†β‹†Β°β€§β˜…Strawbebby228 Desktop

3/10
E

eXist

3/10
1

18f

3/10
C

Chris House

3/10
R

RisingCities EN

3/10
C

crawshaw blog

3/10
N

NanoCloud

3/10
A

About Nanomsg

3/10
U

Urban Data Platform

3/10
P

pictriev, face search engine

3/10
U

UX Recipe

3/10
M

Mastodon hosted on webtoo.ls

3/10
E

Eduardo Davila

3/10
M

Mia Molvray, Paul Kores webpages

3/10
S

squgeim's blog

3/10
T

The Galaxy Project: Data

3/10
C

CodeDocs[xyz]

3/10
B

Balthazar Rouberol

3/10
W

Welcome to BepinEx Docs!

3/10
I

itch.io

3/10
C

CoTrader

3/10
R

RouteViews Archive Project Page

3/10
4

4everland-official-website

3/10
F

func-e

3/10
C

CodePath Guides

3/10
O

Open Source Group Japan - γ‚ͺープンソース・グループ・ジャパン

3/10
S

Superpolator: Some resources on interpolation.

3/10
R

Roman Cheplyaka

3/10
T

thunlp.github.io

3/10
I

itch.io

3/10
U

University of Washington N

3/10
A

Automatic Hebrew Transliteration

3/10
D

Divergence

3/10
H

Hanako Games

3/10
M

My public GitHub repositories

3/10
F

France Patrie β€” Accueil

3/10
A

angular

3/10
T

Thumbprint

3/10
F

Felix Ebert

3/10
C

Chiyuan Zhang

3/10
W

Waf: the build system

3/10
T

Tess E. Smidt

3/10
Y

yamllint documentation β€” yamllint 1.38.0 documentation

3/10
D

Dianne Skoll's Web Site

3/10
S

StellarTerm: Stellar Trading Client

3/10
D

DevTube

3/10
Previous
1...12,69212,69312,69412,69512,696...14,632
Next
Score your tech & saas brand free

Want to improve your AI visibility score?

Read: AEO guide for Tech & SaaS brands β†’

What an AEO score of 4.5/10 means for tech & saas brands

The average Tech & SaaS brand we've scored sits at 4.5/10. That means roughly <1% are positioned to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while the remaining >99% are at risk of being skipped when AI engines answer customer questions.

Common AEO issues in tech & saas

  • Missing Organization JSON-LD with sameAs links to social profiles
  • No llms.txt file declaring the brand to AI crawlers
  • FAQ content rendered without FAQPage schema, so AI engines cannot extract it
  • robots.txt or Cloudflare WAF blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot
  • Thin About pages with no founder/team Person schema

How to improve your tech & saas AEO score

Run a free AEO score for your site and see exactly which signals are missing. The audit takes under a minute and the fix list ships as a one-click JSON-LD + llms.txt + robots.txt patch you can paste into any platform.

Tech & SaaS AI visibility by city

New York CityLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan AntonioSan DiegoDallasSan JoseAustinJacksonvilleSan FranciscoColumbusCharlotteIndianapolis

Browse by industry

πŸ›οΈ Ecommerce & Retail🍽️ Food & BeverageπŸ’ͺ Health & WellnessπŸ’… BeautyπŸ‘— Fashion & ApparelπŸ’° Finance & FintechAll brands β†’