AI Scores / Tech & SaaS

Tech & SaaS AI Scores
Score Your Brand Free
πŸ’»

AI Visibility Scores for Tech and SaaS Brands

B2B buyers ask AI engines for software recommendations every day. The SaaS brands that show up have schema markup, entity clarity, and AI-accessible documentation. See how tech companies score on AI visibility.

3,530,924
Brands Scored
4.7/10
Industry Average
<1%
AI-Ready (8+)

Score Distribution - 3,530,924 Tech & SaaS Brands

AI-Ready8-10
<1%
15,833
Getting There6-7
24%
856,899
Needs Work4-5
61%
2,142,946
Not Discoverable0-3
15%
515,246

Only <1% of tech & saas brands are AI-ready.

The other >99% are being skipped by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.

Score your brand free

3,530,924 brands scored - page 30520 of 35,310

W

www.yasuoka.net

3/10
T

TimJRobinson

3/10
N

Node.js

3/10
M

Making sure you're not a bot!

3/10
F

Florin Bratan

3/10
M

Murrell Group Code

3/10
M

mobl

3/10
D

Denzil Ferreira

3/10
S

SkrilNetz

3/10
H

hdi-project.github.io

3/10
S

Stratum Work

3/10
H

Hakam Shams

3/10
R

roopc.net

3/10
H

Home

3/10
B

Boni Lab

3/10
H

Hello world!

3/10
Z

Z3prover

3/10
W

Wang Genomics Lab at CHOP and PennAsset 1

3/10
D

Demo

3/10
V

Vapor API Docs

3/10
G

Geoinformatics Team

3/10
L

letsbutterfly, Inc.

3/10
A

AjuntamentdeBarcelona.github.io

3/10
J

Jupyter NbClassic β€” Classic Jupyter Notebook

3/10
Q

Qavar

3/10
G

Giga AI

3/10
I

Improv Wi-Fi

3/10
B

Bridge Foundry

3/10
A

ACM SIGMM

3/10
R

robot

3/10
P

PyVCF

3/10
E

ericbarch(dot)com

3/10
S

stb

3/10
M

Medicalmaladies

3/10
C

CEREZA.ZONE

3/10
G

glbinding

3/10
P

pymake API documentation

3/10
M

MetaZ by griff

3/10
G

GemsTracker

3/10
T

Toggle Dark ModeToggle Light ModeToggle Dark ModeToggle Light ModeCode with Modular

3/10
G

GobySoft

3/10
I

Image.sc Forum

3/10
R

RIFE2 Framework : Full

3/10
S

SLADE

3/10
B

Brian Anglin

3/10
W

Wso2

3/10
P

Pieces

3/10
R

Reclaim Cloud

3/10
E

elastix

3/10
A

Arkane Linux

3/10
S

sjero.net::Home

3/10
F

Frank Bria

3/10
T

traggo

3/10
M

M2MSupport.net

3/10
R

RAVE

3/10
P

PostsP(\theta)\thetaDP(\theta\vert D)DP(\theta\vert D)\pi(\theta)\pi(\theta) = P(\theta\vert D)=\dfrac{P(D\vert\theta)P(\theta)}{P(D)}P(D\vert \theta)P(D\vert \theta)P(\theta)\pi(\theta)P(D)P(D)\thetaP(D) = \int_{\Theta} P(D\vert\theta)P(\theta)\text{d}\theta\pi(\theta)\pi(\theta)\theta_1, \dots, \theta_N\theta\begin{split} P(D) &= \int_{\Theta} P(D\vert \theta)P(\theta)\text{d}\theta \\ &\approx \dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N P(D\vert\theta^{(i)})\end{split}N\pi(\theta)\theta(R, +, \cdot, 0, 1)R(+, \cdot)(0, 1)\bf{Ring}\bf{Rng}\it{I}: \bf{Ring} \rightarrow \bf{Rng}\it{A}: \bf{Rng} \rightarrow \bf{Ab}\it{A}\it{A}(S, \cdot, e)S\cdote\it{M}: \bf{Ring} \rightarrow \bf{Mon}\bf{Mon}\mathcal{X}(X, *, e)\mathcal{Y}(Y, *’, f)\it{\phi}: \mathcal{X} \rightarrow \mathcal{Y}\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}\begin{equation}\phi(a * b) = \phi(a) *' \phi(b), \forall a\; b \in \mathcal{X}\end{equation}\begin{equation}\phi(e) = f\end{equation}

3/10
F

Frog

3/10
I

Incubaweb - software y web 2.0

3/10
M

Mastodon hosted on topspicy.social

3/10
A

ABP

3/10
R

Relentless Coding

3/10
P

Parallel Computing and Scientific Machine Learning (SciML): Methods and Applications

3/10
B

Bayesian Optimization and Model-Based Optimization of Expensive Black

3/10
D

DSN

3/10
M

Mastodon hosted on suncoast.dev

3/10
P

PySAT: SAT technology in Python

3/10
N

NorthTech Communications Group

3/10
B

Bryant Kelley

3/10
V

Vitaly Minko's Personal Site

3/10
G

grlc

3/10
T

TMPDIR

3/10
S

Shuhao's Homepage

3/10
B

boxes

3/10
D

David Benjamin

3/10
O

OpenASIP

3/10
γ‚“

んけゃんねる

3/10
H

Home

3/10
S

stefania

3/10
U

UPMEM DPU SDK

3/10
S

Saffron Haas

3/10
L

LANL Open Source Software

3/10
G

Graphite

3/10
N

nil

3/10
T

The CubeSat Simulator Project Page

3/10
Y

YAFOWIL

3/10
A

Apollia.org

3/10
M

Marak

3/10
J

jamesclonk.io

3/10
Z

Zooniverse Developer Docs β€” The Zooniverse Platform 1.0.0 documentation

3/10
D

Daniel MartΓ­

3/10
O

Omar Rizwan

3/10
W

Welcome to Sacred’s documentation! β€” Sacred 0.8.4 documentation

3/10
G

ghamut

3/10
A

Airport

3/10
T

The CHISEL Group

3/10
D

Digital Fusion Ltd

3/10
M

Manager Forum

3/10
J

johndbritton

3/10
G

GMT δΈ­ζ–‡η€ΎεŒΊ

3/10
I

ihaque.org

3/10
Previous
1...30,51830,51930,52030,52130,522...35,310
Next
Score your tech & saas brand free

Want to improve your AI visibility score?

Read: AEO guide for Tech & SaaS brands β†’

What an AEO score of 4.7/10 means for tech & saas brands

The average Tech & SaaS brand we've scored sits at 4.7/10. That means roughly <1% are positioned to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while the remaining >99% are at risk of being skipped when AI engines answer customer questions.

Common AEO issues in tech & saas

  • Missing Organization JSON-LD with sameAs links to social profiles
  • No llms.txt file declaring the brand to AI crawlers
  • FAQ content rendered without FAQPage schema, so AI engines cannot extract it
  • robots.txt or Cloudflare WAF blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot
  • Thin About pages with no founder/team Person schema

How to improve your tech & saas AEO score

Run a free AEO score for your site and see exactly which signals are missing. The audit takes under a minute and the fix list ships as a one-click JSON-LD + llms.txt + robots.txt patch you can paste into any platform.

Tech & SaaS AI visibility by city

New York CityLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan AntonioSan DiegoDallasSan JoseAustinJacksonvilleSan FranciscoColumbusCharlotteIndianapolis

Browse by industry

πŸ›οΈ Ecommerce & Retail🍽️ Food & BeverageπŸ’ͺ Health & WellnessπŸ’… BeautyπŸ‘— Fashion & ApparelπŸ’° Finance & FintechAll brands β†’