Ozgar

What stacks are supported today?

IBM i (AS/400) with RPG and DB2 for i, is Ozgar's credibility wedge and is fully supported today. This is our deepest focus 'by design'. z/OS and objected-oriented languages are in the wait-lists.

What's next on the roadmap?

z/OS COBOL, PL1, Java, and exports/integrations with Jira and Confluence are next. If these matter to you, contact us for timelines.

How is Ozgar deployed?

As an independent platform: on-premises, private cloud, or public cloud. Your enterprise controls data, access, and the LLM.

What is the difference between Ozgar and Bob?

Bob (and other code assistants) help teams generate and modify code faster. Ozgar complements these tools by providing trusted system context and proof - so changes are accurate, complete, and safe in production.

How is this different from modernization or migration services?

Modernization changes the stack. Ozgar clarifies the system first - capturing embedded business logic and tribal knowledge - so any modernization (if pursued) avoids surface-level transformations and unintended risks.

How is this different from static analyzers, doc generators, or IDE copilots?

Static analyzers see files; Ozgar sees the system. Doc generators produce pages; Ozgar produces crisp, linked, visual explanations. Copilots help you type; Ozgar helps decide what's safe to change.

Does Ozgar replace developers or architects?

No. Ozgar augments teams. It reduces search time, exposes dependencies, and provides evidence (pins, diagrams) so people can decide and build with confidence.

Do we need to refactor or change workflows to use Ozgar?

No. Ozgar meets systems as they are. No refactor required; keep your current workflows and tools.