AI visibility score
3.3/ 10Weak

▲ 0.3 since Jun 2026

#2,199,607 of 2,707,329 in Technology

As of 2026-08-07 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

Playing on Hard

Playing on Hard

Unclaimed

ierceg.com · Technology

Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Playing on Hard, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.

AI engines read this profile 6 times

Claude · Meta AI

#2,199,607 of 2,707,329 in Technology for AI visibility

3

AEO Visibility

i

Near-invisible · 3.3/10

5

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Basic · 5/100

4

AI Adoption

i

Basic · 4/100

Share

About Playing on Hard

from our crawl and measurement

"(or as I colorfully heard it today in another context: spam to ham ratio is high!) And so it goes with LLMs as well: what they produce is 90 percent crap." That is how Playing on Hard introduces itself. When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 3.3 out of 10.

Our crawl found a sitemap. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a heading structure that lays out what it offers.

AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).

Industry · Technology
Last scored · Aug 7, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Weak

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Weak

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Weak

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Weak

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Good

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Weak

Little domain authority yet.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.3/10, Playing on Hard is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Playing on Hard

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Playing on Hard: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Playing on Hard.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 7, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/ierceg

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Playing on Hard." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/ierceg

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform