AI Visibility Scorecard
polyskeptic.com · Media & Entertainment
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Skepticism, Properly Applied, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 4 times
Claude · Meta AI · Apple Intelligence
#148,857 of 1,966,759 in Media & Entertainment for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.9/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
Skepticism, Properly Applied describes itself simply: "Skip to content Skepticism, Properly Applied Dissent is Critical and Necessary Featured I’m on Substack I’m still writing, and noting (or whatever it is called), but I’ve switched over to." Its AI visibility score is 5.9 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic) and Meta AI.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.9/10, Skepticism, Properly Applied has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Are we the authority of who/what we are?
In a banal sense, we are obviously the most authoritative source of who we are. Only I have access to my thoughts, feelings, and worldviews. And in a legal, and possibly moral, sense, nobody has authority over what decisions I make or what I believe. But in another sense, our idea of what we are, the narrative that we are telling, to ourselves about ourselves, is a kind of fiction.
Turnabout is fair play?
It is true that many marginalized groups, including the LGBTQ+ community, BIPOC, and so forth have had a rough ride in the world. And it’s definitely the case, IMHO, that cultural, political, and legal changes need to be made to improve their access to legal protection and to facilitate cultural growth towards a more just world.
What about the truly awful?
So, I know many of you are thinking, ok, maybe you have a point.
Conclusions?
I am not sure, honestly. There are truly awful people out there, though they are few. I’m not sure who they are, but I have my biases. David Silverman is, IMO, odious but I leave open the possibility that he might say something I agree with or maybe eventually grow and change. I will likely have to hear this second-hand because I no longer follow him.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Skepticism, Properly Applied
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Skepticism, Properly Applied.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/polyskeptic
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Skepticism, Properly Applied." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/polyskeptic
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform