AI Visibility Scorecard
1692 Before and After
1692beforeandafter.com · Education
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read 1692 Before and After, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 11 times
Meta AI · ChatGPT · Claude · Apple Intelligence
#51,766 of 937,412 in Education for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iVisible · 6.2/10
40
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Agent-ready · 40/100
?
AI Adoption
iNone detected · -/100
About 1692 Before and After
from our crawl and measurement
1692 Before and After is a Salem, Ma business whose own site puts it this way: "Locally owned, historian-led Salem walking tours. Fact-based Salem Witch Trials history tours and adult ghost tours, based on 30+ years of research." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.2 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Place, TravelAgency, Organization), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited 4 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic), GPTBot (ChatGPT) and Applebot (Siri). By its own structured data it is a travel business.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Strong
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Strong
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Good
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6.2/10, 1692 Before and After has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for 1692 Before and After
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The AEO Checklist Every Small Business Owner Needs Right Now
Your potential customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude questions about your product category. These AI models are giving answers without sending traffic to your website. You're not losing rank. You're losing visibility entirely.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for 1692 Before and After.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 7, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/1692beforeandafter
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for 1692 Before and After." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/1692beforeandafter
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform