AI Visibility Scorecard
According to Matthew
· Healthcare
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl According to Matthew, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · ChatGPT
#650,568 of 925,288 in Healthcare for AI visibility
3
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 3/100
Healthcare average 11
Top 73% of Healthcare
See what's behind this score →4
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
Healthcare average 0.0
0 relationships · Healthcare average 3
See what's behind this score →0
0
About According to Matthew
from our crawl and measurement
According to Matthew describes itself simply: "Somewhere between 2500 and 5000 of those are under the age of eighteen." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 3.6 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (ItemList). It is missing an llms.txt file, a sitemap and a heading structure that lays out what it offers.
- Company ·
- According to Matthew
- Website ·
- accordingtomatthew.com
- Industry ·
- Healthcare
- Site status ·
- Live (The website showed an active business site when last checked (Oct 31, 2026).)
- Last scored ·
- Aug 27, 2026
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Good
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 3.6/10, According to Matthew is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for According to Matthew
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Company Named by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude
When a buyer asks ChatGPT which company to use, two different things can happen. ChatGPT can name a company in its answer. Or it can link to a web page as a source. Most advice about AI visibility is about the second one. Our data says the first one is what matters.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for According to Matthew.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 27, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/accordingtomatthew
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for According to Matthew." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/accordingtomatthew
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform