AI Visibility Scorecard
adventuresinstem.com · Education
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Ana's Adventures in STEM, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · ChatGPT
#463,364 of 937,492 in Education for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4.7/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
"Scaffolding better thinking across classrooms, cognition, and code." That is how Ana's Adventures in STEM introduces itself. When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 4.7 out of 10.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.7/10, Ana's Adventures in STEM is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
How do decisions get made?
The research program examines what happens when an AI system becomes part of the process through which a person decides what information or interpretation should be trusted. 01 / 03 Epistemic arbitration How users resolve conflicts between AI-mediated interpretations and independent external sources of information.
How does the classroom shape the method?
A background in physics, computer science, educational psychology, curriculum development, and assessment design informs the questions at the center of the research. Physics · Computer Science · STEM · Cybersecurity · AP CSP · Curriculum design · Assessment Teaching and curriculum Stay in conversation
Research, collaboration, or speaking inquiry?
Get in touch Anastasia Goudy, M.Ed. Human–AI Interaction Researcher · Educator Research Publications Speaking ORCID LinkedIn Contact © 2026 Anastasia Goudy. Built for careful research, public scholarship, and scholarly exchange.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Ana's Adventures in STEM
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Ana's Adventures in STEM.
Scored by Engagemii on September 2, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/adventuresinstem
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Ana's Adventures in STEM." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/adventuresinstem
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform