AI Visibility Scorecard
apis.how · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl apis.how by QuantHow, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · Apple Intelligence
#1,512,417 of 2,704,208 in Technology for AI visibility
<1
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · <1/100
Technology average 28
Top 91% of Technology
See what's behind this score →3.8
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
0 relationships on record. Businesses in Technology average 4. Claim your page and Engagemii is your first.
See what's behind this score →0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
Technology average 17
See what's behind this score →0
from our crawl and measurement
apis.how by QuantHow describes itself simply: "KO EN API Management Platform apis.how AI 서비스를 위한 통합 API 게이트웨이 하나의 API 키로 LLM, TTS, STT 등 다양한 AI 서비스에 접근하세요." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 3.8 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic) and Applebot (Siri).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 3.8/10, apis.how by QuantHow is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
왜 apis.how인가?
개발자를 위해 설계된 API 관리 플랫폼 🔑 통합 API 키 하나의 키로 모든 서비스에 접근. Scope 기반 세밀한 권한 제어. ⚡ Rate Limiting 글로벌, 서비스별, 토큰별 다계층 속도 제한. 📊 사용량 대시보드 실시간 호출 수, 토큰 사용량, 비용 추정 모니터링. 🔄 프로바이더 Fallback 장애 시 자동 프로바이더 전환으로 높은 가용성 보장. 🛡️ IP 화이트리스트 접근 가능 IP를 제한하여 무단 사용 차단. 📋 감사 로그 모든 API 호출 이력 추적 및 이상 탐지 알림.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for apis.how by QuantHow
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
When a buyer asks ChatGPT which company to use, two different things can happen. ChatGPT can name a company in its answer. Or it can link to a web page as a source. Most advice about AI visibility is about the second one. Our data says the first one is what matters.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for apis.how by QuantHow.
Scored by Engagemii on October 4, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/apis-how
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for apis.how by QuantHow." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/apis-how
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform