AI visibility score
4.6/ 10Fair

#617,217 of 2,706,042 in Technology

As of 2026-08-01 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?

BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?

Unclaimed

baxbench.com · Technology

Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.

AI engines read this profile 8 times

Claude · Apple Intelligence · Meta AI

#617,217 of 2,706,042 in Technology for AI visibility

4

AI Naming Predictability

i

Rarely named · 4/100

More likely to be named than 89% of Technology companies

5

AEO Visibility

i

Borderline · 4.6/10

0

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Not agent-ready · 0/100

8

AI Adoption

i

Basic · 8/100

Share

About BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?

from our crawl and measurement

BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends? describes itself simply: "We introduce a novel benchmark to evaluate LLMs on secure and correct code generation, showing that even flagship LLMs are not ready for coding automation, frequently generating insecure or." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 4.6 out of 10.

Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.

AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).

Industry · Technology
Last scored · Aug 1, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Strong

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Weak

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Weak

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Fair

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Strong

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Weak

Little domain authority yet.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.6/10, BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends? is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Frequently Asked Questions

BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?

Mark Vero1, Niels Mündler1, Victor Chibotaru2, Veselin Raychev2, Maximilian Baader1, Nikola Jovanović1, Jingxuan He3, Martin Vechev1,4 1SRI Lab@ETH Zurich, 2LogicStar.ai, 3UC Berkeley, 4INSAIT arXiv Code Dataset Leaderboard We are calling for community contributions! Please visit our GitHub repository for details.

What is BaxBench?

BaxBench is a novel coding benchmark for evaluating the ability of LLMs on generating correct and secure code in realistic, security-critical settings. The benchmark consists of 392 security-critical backend coding tasks. These tasks are formed by combining 28 coding scenarios with 14 popular backend development frameworks across 6 programming languages.

How are BaxBench tasks tested?

The LLM-generated solutions are tested for correctness using the end-to-end functionality tests provided for each scenario. Then, to assess the vulnerability of the generated programs, we execute concrete security exploits on the generated solutions. These exploits are designed by security experts w.r.t. the scenario and are automatically executed on the models' solutions.

How can I contribute to BaxBench?

We welcome scenario, framework, test, or exploit contributions as well as general feedback from the community. Please visit our GitHub repository for details.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Claim your page free

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/baxbench

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Secure and Correct Backends?." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/baxbench

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform