AI visibility score
4.8/ 10Fair

▲ 2.8 since Jul 2026

#1,222,245 of 2,705,580 in Technology

As of 2026-08-01 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

Better with Data

Better with Data

Unclaimed

betterwithdata.substack.com · Technology

Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Better with Data, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.

AI engines read this profile 1 times

Claude

#1,222,245 of 2,705,580 in Technology for AI visibility

5

AEO Visibility

i

Borderline · 4.8/10

5

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Basic · 5/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About Better with Data

from our crawl and measurement

"Musings about data, analytics, code, leading technical teams, and supply chains. Click to read Better with Data, by Erika Pullum (Swartz), a Substack publication with hundreds...." That is how Better with Data introduces itself. When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 4.8 out of 10.

The gap is on the page itself: the site is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file, a sitemap, which are the first things an answer engine looks for.

Industry · Technology
Last scored · Aug 1, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Weak

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Fair

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Weak

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Weak

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Weak

No inbound links found yet.

Domain Authority

Strong

Established authority for your domain.

Reference Presence

Strong

Recognized in AI knowledge graphs.

News & Press

Strong

Press and news coverage.

Community

Strong

Forum and community discussion.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.8/10, Better with Data is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Better with Data

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Better with Data: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Better with Data.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/betterwithdata-substack

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Better with Data." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/betterwithdata-substack

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform