AI Visibility Scorecard
· Technology
At 1.63/10, ClickQ is near-invisible in AI search today. Most AI engines will not name it when asked about its category. The weakest signals are E-E-A-T Signals, Backlinks and Domain Authority. That is fixable, and the signals below show where to start.
AI engines read this profile 3 times
Claude
Top 50% in Technology for AI visibility
3
1.63
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
0 relationships on record. Businesses in Technology average 4. Claim your page and Engagemii is your first.
See what's behind this score →75
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Transactable · 75/100
Technology average 17
See what's behind this score →0
from our crawl and measurement
ClickQ is one of the businesses we track in the Technology space. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 1.63 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (SoftwareApplication, Organization, FAQPage). It is missing an llms.txt file, a sitemap and a heading structure that lays out what it offers.
AI crawlers have read this profile 3 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Strong
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
-
Not yet measured.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 1.63/10, ClickQ is near-invisible to AI engines today. That is fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
이런 고민 하고 계신가요?
01 02 03 04 01 모바일 결재도 안 되고 알림도 안 와서 불편해요. 02 급여 계산하느라 매달 야근해도 실수해요. 03 회사 결재 양식과 시스템 양식이 달라 번거로워요. 04 인사평가 정리도 힘들고 결과서를 만들기도 막막해요. 모바일 결재가 안 되니까, 결재 한 번 받으려고 외근 중에도 컴퓨터를 켜야 해요. 그룹웨어가 10년 넘은 시스템이라 불편해서 자꾸 메신저로 일을 처리하게 돼요. 모바일 알림이 안 오니까, 결재 서류 올라온 걸 놓칠까 봐 종일 그룹웨어 들여봐야 해요. 근태 데이터를 Excel로 받아서 일일이 수동으로 입력해야 해요. 수당 계산 실수가 발생해서 재지급을 해야 하는 경우가 생겨요. 4대보험 요율, 정산, 계산, 보수월액 등 다 너무 어렵고 복잡해요.
ChatGPT doesn't crawl the web like Google does. When someone asks Claude about the best project management tools, the model isn't searching your website in real-time. It's pulling from training data that stopped months or years ago.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for ClickQ.
Scored by Engagemii on November 9, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/cliickq
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for ClickQ." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/cliickq
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform