AI Visibility Scorecard
Cracking Science
crackingscience.com · Food & Beverage
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Cracking Science, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 5 times
Claude · Meta AI · Apple Intelligence
#882,167 of 1,392,203 in Food & Beverage for AI visibility
<1
4
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 3.6/10
10
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 10/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Cracking Science
from our crawl and measurement
Cracking Science describes itself simply: "Essential grade 8/9 GCSE science exam workbooks with contemporary questions and fully worded solutions. Maximise your results by using these up to date exam revision workbooks." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 3.6 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (WebSite), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap. It is missing a heading structure that lays out what it offers.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Weak
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Strong
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.6/10, Cracking Science is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Cracking Science
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Cracking Science.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 10, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/crackingscience
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Cracking Science." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/crackingscience
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform