Stealth Networks

Isn't it safer to select the biggest brand?

The adage is that you don't get fired for hiring the big brands. This may be true initially but the big brands are being hacked incessantly, so this approach is flawed. Big brands are big because they spend the most on advertising and have a history of success. When implementing new technology, the playing field is relatively level, with new companies entering the market daily.

How do I know if I am really protected?

We provide a cyber risk analysis scan before and after which correlates to the the NIST-800-53 framework and the entire Mitre attack framework, all 4,700 endpoints mapped directly to their endpoints. It is a subscription so you can continue to run it as frequently as needed, risks will show up on your dashboard.

Can you prove that man-in-the-middle is a threat?

I can't show you the wind but I can prove that the wind is there because of it's impact on our environment. In the same way, we read every week about cyber attacks, ransomeware and data breaches, each one more severe than the prior one. The adversaries are breaching the network, the evidence is there. This is why we begin our remediation by upgrading to a true SASE Network with Zero Trust Networking features.Q:

If I use the tools that everyone else uses, does that make me safer?

The answer is 'Maybe'. Contrary to this line of thinking, using the big brand tools could make you more of a target because the adversaries know the make and model of the safe that they are trying to crack. For example, PCs were the favorite target for viruses because they represented 95% of the market and Macs only 5% in the 1990's.

Any plans for third-party validation and compliance frameworks?

Yes, we actively maintains alignment with leading frameworks including ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and is exploring how to meet FedRAMP compliance. We also get the platform and technology pen tested yearly.