AI visibility score
5.2/ 10Fair

▲ 0.2 since Jun 2026

#276,421 of 936,925 in Education

As of 2026-08-11 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

DOING STS

DOING STS

Unclaimed

doingsts.com · Education

Somewhat visible. AI bots can read DOING STS, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.

AI engines read this profile 7 times

Meta AI · Claude

#276,421 of 936,925 in Education for AI visibility

5

AEO Visibility

i

Borderline · 5.2/10

0

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Not agent-ready · 0/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About DOING STS

from our crawl and measurement

DOING STS is a business whose own site puts it this way: "Doing STS is a methods lab that works across feminist science and technology studies (STS) and affect studies through public workshops, lectures, reading and writing groups, and." Its AI visibility score is 5.2 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.

Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.

AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).

Industry · Education
Last scored · Aug 11, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Good

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Good

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Fair

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Fair

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Strong

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Weak

Little domain authority yet.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.2/10, DOING STS has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for DOING STS

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for DOING STS: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for DOING STS.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 11, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/doingsts

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for DOING STS." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/doingsts

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform