AI Visibility Scorecard
editdevelopment.com · Professional Services
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read EDIT Development, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 4 times
Claude · Meta AI
#140,792 of 526,055 in Professional Services for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.2/10
30
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 30/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
EDIT Development describes itself simply: "Leadership development experts specialising in inclusive leadership, talent management, coaching and building diversity cultures." Its AI visibility score is 5.2 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.
On its own pages the site does well on crawler access and the files AI engines look for and sitemaps and entity links AI can follow. It is passable on some structured data, a workable page structure, a partly stated business identity and a few credibility markers.
Off the page, other sites link to it. There is some, but not much, sign that the domain is only lightly established. Beyond that, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business, there is no press coverage to draw on, nobody is discussing it where AI engines look and it does not come up on Reddit. None of that can be fixed on the page: it has to be earned.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Fair
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Good
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Good
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.2/10, EDIT Development has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for EDIT Development
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for EDIT Development.
Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/editdevelopment
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for EDIT Development." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/editdevelopment
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform