AI Visibility Scorecard
Editing that Works
editingthatworks.com · Other
At 2.37/10, Editing that Works is near-invisible in AI search today. Most AI engines will not name it when asked about its category. The weakest signals are Structured Data, E-E-A-T Signals and AI Discoverability. That is fixable, and the signals below show where to start.
AI engines read this profile 3 times
Claude
19
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 19/100
Average 15
Top 58% of Other
See what's behind this score →2.37
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
0 relationships on record. Businesses average 3. Claim your page and Engagemii is your first.
See what's behind this score →0
0
About Editing that Works
from our crawl and measurement
Editing that Works describes itself simply: "You'll probably get the best results from the 'process' method, but the 'pick out' method is a great way to become familiar with them." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 2.37 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
- Company ·
- Editing that Works
- Website ·
- editingthatworks.com
- Industry ·
- Other
- Site status ·
- Live (The website showed an active business site when last checked (Aug 26, 2026).)
- Last scored ·
- Nov 8, 2026
The 6 on-page signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Weak
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
The 6 off-page signals AI reads
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
-
Not yet measured.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 2.37/10, Editing that Works is near-invisible to AI engines today. That is fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where from? Where next?
The principles come from web and other resources, and from experience. There are some sources at the end of each page You'll also see some ideas for what else to read.
Why your brand doesn't show up in ChatGPT answers (and how to fix it)
ChatGPT doesn't crawl the web like Google does. When someone asks Claude about the best project management tools, the model isn't searching your website in real-time. It's pulling from training data that stopped months or years ago.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for Editing that Works.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on November 8, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/editingthatworks
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Editing that Works." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/editingthatworks
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform