⚡ This is your brand? Claim your page FREE and bring it to life on AI search.

AI Visibility Scorecard

Experimental History

Experimental History

Unclaimed

experimentalhistory.substack.com · Education

Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Experimental History, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.

Monitoring for AI engine activity

In the Engagemii AEO index

#20,931 of 891,740 in Education for AI visibility

6.8

/10

AEO Score

Share

About Experimental History

from our crawl and measurement

Experimental History describes itself simply: "1) Find what's true and make it useful. 2) Publish every other Tuesday. 3) Photo cred: my dad. Click to read Experimental History, by Adam Mastroianni, a Substack publication with tens of." Its AI visibility score is 6.8 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.

Our crawl found a sitemap. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a heading structure that lays out what it offers.

Industry · Education
Last scored · Aug 10, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Higher is better · 0-10

Structured Data

1

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

2

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

4

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

1

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

6

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

3

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

0

No inbound links found yet.

Domain Trust

8

Established authority for your domain.

Entity Presence

10

Recognized in AI knowledge graphs.

News Mentions

10

Press and news coverage.

Community

10

Forum and community discussion.

Reddit

0

No Reddit mentions found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6.8/10, Experimental History has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Is this your brand?

The exact fixes for Experimental History

Which AI engines already crawl you

Weekly ChatGPT & Claude citation tracking

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Experimental History: AEO & AI Search

The AEO Checklist Every Small Business Owner Needs Right Now

Your potential customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude questions about your product category. These AI models are giving answers without sending traffic to your website. You're not losing rank. You're losing visibility entirely.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Experimental History.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 10, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/experimentalhistory-substack

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Experimental History." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/experimentalhistory-substack

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform