AI Visibility Scorecard
Foam Cone
foamcone.com · Sports & Recreation
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Foam Cone, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 11 times
Claude · Meta AI · ChatGPT · Apple Intelligence
#84,381 of 251,457 in Sports & Recreation for AI visibility
0
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 0/100
More likely to be named than 70% of Sports & Recreation companies
4
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4/10
30
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 30/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Foam Cone
from our crawl and measurement
"Foam Cone - Disappearing practice cones for all field sports. Agility Cones. Practice Cones. Training Cones. Sport Cones." That is how Foam Cone of Columbus, OH introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 4.0 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (LocalBusiness, WebSite), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap. It is missing a heading structure that lays out what it offers.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including GPTBot (ChatGPT).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Good
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Good
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Strong
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Strong
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Weak
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Fair
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4/10, Foam Cone is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Foam Cone
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Foam Cone.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 2, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/foamcone
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Foam Cone." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/foamcone
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform