AI visibility score
3.6/ 10Weak

#1,491,573 of 1,966,415 in Media & Entertainment

As of 2026-08-01 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →Live terminal →

AI Visibility Scorecard

Good at Looking

Good at Looking

Unclaimed

goodatlooking.com · Media & Entertainment

Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Good at Looking, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.

AI engines read this profile 4 times

Claude · Meta AI · ShapBot

#1,491,573 of 1,966,415 in Media & Entertainment for AI visibility

<1

AI Naming Predictability

i

Rarely named · <1/100

Top 79% of Media & Entertainment

4

AEO Visibility

i

Near-invisible · 3.6/10

5

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Basic · 5/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About Good at Looking

from our crawl and measurement

Good at Looking is a business whose own site puts it this way: "It asks, ‘How can textiles unpack, question, unspool, unravel and therefore reimagine the world around us?’ Two works in the Barbican’s exhibition are particularly powerful expressions of." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 3.6 out of 10.

On its own pages the site does well on a clear heading structure. It is passable on a few credibility markers, basic crawler access and partial sitemap and link coverage. What holds it back is a clearly stated business identity and structured data describing the business.

Off the page, other sites link to it. Beyond that, the domain does not yet read as established, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business, there is no press coverage to draw on, nobody is discussing it where AI engines look and it does not come up on Reddit. None of that can be fixed on the page: it has to be earned.

AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).

Industry · Media & Entertainment
Last scored · Aug 1, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Good

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Weak

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Fair

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Good

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Fair

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Weak

Little domain authority yet.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.6/10, Good at Looking is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can design help us have difficult conversations?

23/12/2017 2 Comments ​The year of 2017 will be bookended by women speaking out about sexual harassment. And these bookends are both captured visually in two designs created by women: the pink pussyhat and the #metoo hashtag. Both were created as visual symbols of, and means of communicating, women's anger and outrage. They've been hugely influential, spearheading vital and timely campaigns.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Good at Looking

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Claim your page free

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Good at Looking: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Good at Looking.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/goodatlooking

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Good at Looking." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/goodatlooking

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform