AI visibility score
6.4/ 10Good

▲ 1.4 since Jun 2026

#20,679 of 923,103 in Healthcare

As of 2026-07-31 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

Halliday Sutherland

Halliday Sutherland

Unclaimed

hallidaysutherland.com · Healthcare

Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Halliday Sutherland, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.

AI engines read this profile 5 times

Meta AI · Apple Intelligence · Claude

#20,679 of 923,103 in Healthcare for AI visibility

6

AEO Visibility

i

Visible · 6.4/10

45

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Agent-ready · 45/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About Halliday Sutherland

from our crawl and measurement

"Questions and answers about the book *Exterminating Poverty*, Dr Halliday Sutherland’s fight against eugenics, and the Stopes v. Sutherland trial." That is how Halliday Sutherland introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.4 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.

Our crawl found structured data on the page (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Person), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap.

AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including Applebot (Siri) and Meta AI.

Industry · Healthcare
Last scored · Jul 31, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Fair

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Strong

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Strong

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Fair

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Strong

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Good

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Strong

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Fair

Established authority for your domain.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6.4/10, Halliday Sutherland has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Marie Stopes promote birth control solely because she wanted to help poor women?

No. Her Mothers’ Clinic was also a eugenic project. It was "just as much the aim of Constructive Birth Control to secure conception to those married people who are healthy, childless, and desire children, as it is to furnish security from conception to those who are racially diseased, already overburdened with children, or in any specific way unfitted for parenthood." "Racial diseases" included Consumption and "unfitted for parenthood" included the risk of unemployment.

Was Dr Sutherland motivated only by his Catholic faith?

No. Sutherland began to oppose eugenics long before he became a Catholic because it conflicted with his medical work on tuberculosis. In Consumption: Its Cause and Cure, he identified eugenicists as the main obstacle to preventing the disease, sevearl years before his conversion. It is likely that Sutherland was attracted to Catholicism because of its longstanding opposition to eugenics.

What was the Stopes v Sutherland libel trial of 1923 all about?

In his 1922 book Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine Against the Neo-Malthusians, Sutherland attacked her clinic as "Exposing the Poor to Experiment". She sued him for libel and he was arraigned in the High Court in February 1923.

Did Marie Stopes win her case against Halliday Sutherland?

No. Dr Sutherland and his co-defendant, publishers Harding & More, won in the High Court. Stopes appealed and the Court of Appeal ruled (2 to 1) in her favour in July 1923, awarding her damages of £100. Sutherland then appealed to the House of Lords, then Britain's highest court, and won conclusively in November 1924 (4 to 1). Costs were awarded to Sutherland.

Why does the case still matter today?

Eugenics is alive and well today, though it is being achieved by stealth and obfuscatory language. The technology available is vastly superior to that available at the beginning of the Twentieth Century. While the language has changed, the agenda has not, and the plain-speaking of the eugenists of the 1920s reveal the dark heart of modern eugenics.

Where can I see the original documents evidence?

The primary documents are available on this site, including The Soil and the Seed in Tuberculosis (1912), Consumption: Its Cause and Cure (1917), and Stopes’ Tenets of the CBC (1921).

Where can I learn more about Stopes v Sutherland 1923?

The full story is told in the book "Exterminating Poverty: The true story of the eugenic plan to get rid of the poor, and the Scottish doctor who fought against it." Drawing on original sources, it explains the 1923 trial between Marie Stopes and Dr Halliday Sutherland and the wider social context. You can access a copy is in the Wellcome Institute Library in London.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Halliday Sutherland

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Halliday Sutherland: AEO & AI Search

The AEO Checklist Every Small Business Owner Needs Right Now

Your potential customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude questions about your product category. These AI models are giving answers without sending traffic to your website. You're not losing rank. You're losing visibility entirely.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Halliday Sutherland.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/hallidaysutherland

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Halliday Sutherland." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/hallidaysutherland

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform