AI Visibility Scorecard
hardtofill.com · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Hard to Fill, companies that can't fill their roles, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
Monitoring for AI engine activity
In the Engagemii AEO index
#1,920,748 of 2,705,965 in Technology for AI visibility
4
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 3.9/10
0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
12
AI Adoption
iBasic · 12/100
from our crawl and measurement
"A list of companies that have provably failed to fill their roles, with the evidence for each one." That is how Hard to Fill, companies that can't fill their roles introduces itself. When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 3.9 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.9/10, Hard to Fill, companies that can't fill their roles is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
What is actually filled in?
The question is not how many rows there are, it is how many you can act on today. Every figure below is counted from the file you would receive, not written into this page. 50% of companies come with a website For 3,405 of them the company's own website points back at the job board we found them on, so you can confirm you have the right company in about ten seconds.
Is this you?
Four ways people use the same file. Find yours. You sell teams, not candidates Staff augmentation, nearshore, managed delivery. “Stop trying to hire this person, use our team” only lands on someone who has already tried and failed — and until now you had no way to know which prospects those were. This file is that list.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Hard to Fill, companies that can't fill their roles
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Hard to Fill, companies that can't fill their roles.
Scored by Engagemii on September 30, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/hardtofill
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Hard to Fill, companies that can't fill their roles." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/hardtofill
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform