AI Visibility Scorecard
howhumansdidit.com · Home & Living
At 2.35/10, HOW HUMANS DID IT is near-invisible in AI search today. Most AI engines will not name it when asked about its category. The weakest signals are E-E-A-T Signals, Backlinks and Domain Authority. That is fixable, and the signals below show where to start.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · Apple Intelligence
Top 25% in Home & Living for AI visibility
<1
2.35
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
0 relationships on record. Businesses in Home & Living average 2. Claim your page and Engagemii is your first.
See what's behind this score →35
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Agent-ready · 35/100
Home & Living average 21
See what's behind this score →0
from our crawl and measurement
HOW HUMANS DID IT describes itself simply: "Practical history for adults: the real problems humans faced, what they actually did, what the evidence says, and how it worked." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 2.35 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, WebSite), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have read this profile 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic) and Applebot (Siri).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Good
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Strong
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
-
Not yet measured.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 2.35/10, HOW HUMANS DID IT is near-invisible to AI engines today. That is fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
How do you save a feast when the clock is already running?
Fresh meat was not a stockpile. It was a deadline. The answer was not one invention, but a stack of imperfect defenses.The clue10,839 bone fragmentsAn organized processing site in eastern JordanThe payoffDry · Salt · Smoke · ColdSeveral weak barriers became one strong systemFollow the evidenceWatch Episode 01The problems
What did humans have to figure out?
No dynasties, no dates to memorize. A person, a problem, what they actually did — and what the evidence says about it.01In researchHow did people boil water before pots?Drop fire-heated stones into anything waterproof, repeat. Archaeologists still trip over the leftovers.Page opens with its episode02In researchHow did people make fire before matches?For most of human history, making fire was the backup plan.
ChatGPT doesn't crawl the web like Google does. When someone asks Claude about the best project management tools, the model isn't searching your website in real-time. It's pulling from training data that stopped months or years ago.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for HOW HUMANS DID IT.
Scored by Engagemii on November 9, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/howhumansdidit
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for HOW HUMANS DID IT." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/howhumansdidit
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform