AI Visibility Scorecard
Human Options
humanoptions.org · Nonprofits
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Human Options, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 10 times
Claude · ChatGPT · Apple Intelligence · Meta AI
#9,272 of 827,220 in Nonprofits for AI visibility
26
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.2/10
35
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Agent-ready · 35/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Human Options
from our crawl and measurement
"IMAGINE LIVING A LIFE WITHOUT FEAR. Since 1981, Human Options has impacted the lives of more than 500,000 people affected by relationship violence." That is how Human Options of Irvine, CA introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.8 out of 10, readable in places, missing in others.
The site gets some of it right: it has structured data on the page (WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList), a sitemap, a readable heading structure. What holds it back is what is absent, including an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited the site 6 times in our tracking, so the engines are already looking.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Good
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Strong
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Strong
Recognized in AI knowledge graphs.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Fair
Social discussion and mentions.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.2/10, Human Options has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Human Options
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Human Options.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/humanoptions-org
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Human Options." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/humanoptions-org
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform