AI Visibility Scorecard
invullen.nl
invullen.com · Other
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read invullen.nl, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
Monitoring for AI engine activity
In the Engagemii AEO index
0
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.3/10
40
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Agent-ready · 40/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About invullen.nl
from our crawl and measurement
"Formuleer je leerdoel en stuur deelnemers vooraf een verkenning. Zie waar je groep staat tegenover wat je wilt bereiken. Voor trainers en facilitators." That is how invullen.nl: Van leerdoel naar groepsinzicht of De Bilt introduces itself. Its AI visibility score is 5.3 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Good
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Strong
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Strong
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.3/10, invullen.nl has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Waarom vooraf en niet aan het begin?
Veel trainers doen een peiling of check-in aan het begin van de sessie. Dat werkt, maar je mist drie dingen. Je kunt nog bijsturen Bij een rondje aan het begin loop je al. Je kunt je programma niet meer aanpassen. Vooraf kun je je inlezen in wat je nog niet weet, gericht voorbeelden uitzoeken en werkvormen kiezen die aansluiten bij wat er speelt. Eerlijkere antwoorden In een groep kijken mensen naar elkaar.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for invullen.nl
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for invullen.nl.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on October 7, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/invullen
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for invullen.nl." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/invullen
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform