IGC

"The two didn’t talk to each otherThe data and phone not only talk to each other, they now live on the same physical network." That is how IGC introduces itself. When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 3.3 out of 10.

On its own pages the site does well on a clear heading structure and a clearly stated business identity. It is passable on basic crawler access. What holds it back is sitemaps and entity links AI can follow, structured data describing the business and credibility markers like credentials or reviews.

Off the page there is only faint evidence that only a handful of sites link to it. Beyond that, the domain does not yet read as established, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business, there is no press coverage to draw on, nobody is discussing it where AI engines look and it does not come up on Reddit. None of that can be fixed on the page: it has to be earned.

AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic). The site links to no social profiles, so there is nothing tying the brand to a wider presence.