AI Visibility Scorecard
kind.app · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Kind, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 7 times
Claude · Meta AI · ShapBot
#722,310 of 2,705,481 in Technology for AI visibility
5
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4.6/10
0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
Kind describes itself simply: "The patient has the opportunity to answer the form in the comfort of their home, while the healthcare provider can prepare for the patient meeting.40kPatients in Kind4.8/5On Google." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 4.6 out of 10.
On the page itself the strengths are clear: a clear heading structure. What holds it back is a clearly stated business identity, the technical files AI engines look for, such as llms.txt or an open robots.txt, sitemaps and entity links AI can follow, structured data describing the business and credibility markers like credentials or reviews.
Away from its own site, other sites link to it. There is some, but not much, sign that the domain is only lightly established. Beyond that, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business, there is no press coverage to draw on, nobody is discussing it where AI engines look and it does not come up on Reddit. Those are earned elsewhere on the web, not fixed on the site itself.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.6/10, Kind is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Did you know that?
80%Reduce last-minute cancellations by 80%. Keep track of your appointments with our automatic reminders sent 24 hours before each session.4.9/5On App Store100%Increase your availability from 1 hour per day to 24 hours per day.1hSave up to 1 hour with each new patient contact using Kind's capability to create customized health forms.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Kind
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Kind.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/kind-app
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Kind." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/kind-app
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform