AI Visibility Scorecard
Lanja
lanjacolis.com · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Lanja, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · Meta AI
#1,876,685 of 2,706,131 in Technology for AI visibility
0
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 0/100
More likely to be named than 20% of Technology companies
4
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 3.6/10
0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Lanja
from our crawl and measurement
Lanja describes itself simply: "Envoyez facilement vos colis à Madagascar et à l'étranger grâce à Lanja. Service sécurisé et économique pour faire transporter vos colis par des particuliers." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 3.6 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic) and Meta AI.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.6/10, Lanja is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Pourquoi choisir Lanja ?
Économie Rentabilisez vos trajets en transportant des colis. Sécurité Paiement sécurisé débloqué à la réception du colis. Écologie Réduisez les émissions CO2 avec des trajets existants. Solidarité Renforcez les liens au sein de votre diaspora.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Lanja
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Lanja.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on October 14, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/lanjacolis
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Lanja." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/lanjacolis
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform