AI Visibility Scorecard
lyakira
lyakira.com · Other
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl lyakira, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
Monitoring for AI engine activity
In the Engagemii AEO index
4
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 3.8/10
25
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 25/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About lyakira
from our crawl and measurement
lyakira is a business whose own site puts it this way: "받아보고 결정하는 후불제 개발 외주. AI 챗봇·RAG·업무 자동화·크롤링·웹/앱을 2주에 39만원부터 만들어 드립니다." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 3.8 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (ProfessionalService), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Fair
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.8/10, lyakira is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
지금까지 외주는 왜 실패했을까요?
대부분의 외주는 핵심 개발을 먼저 하지 않습니다. 상당한 비용과 기간을 들인 뒤에야 핵심에 착수합니다. lyakira는 그 순서를 앞당깁니다. 가장 불확실한 핵심을 먼저 증명(PoC)한 뒤, 검증된 범위만 본 개발로 진행합니다.01‘핵심 기능’을 먼저 만들지 않음성패를 좌우하는 핵심 기능보다 로그인·화면·설정 등 주변 기능을 먼저 구현합니다. 핵심이 끝까지 미뤄져, 그 위에 쌓아 온 작업이 헛수고가 될 위험이 있습니다.02타당성 확인 없는 선투자실현 가능 여부를 검증하지 않은 채 상당한 예산과 기간을 먼저 투입합니다. 결과가 기대와 다를 경우 투입 비용의 회수가 어렵습니다.03동작하는 결과물 없이 진행기획서와 진행률 보고만 오갈 뿐, 실제로 동작하는 결과물을 중간에 확인하기 어렵습니다.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for lyakira
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for lyakira.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on October 3, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/lyakira
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for lyakira." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/lyakira
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform