AI Visibility Scorecard
madinterview.com · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl MADInterview, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
Monitoring for AI engine activity
In the Engagemii AEO index
#1,604,137 of 2,707,789 in Technology for AI visibility
4
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4.4/10
0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
6
AI Adoption
iBasic · 6/100
from our crawl and measurement
Crack the Machine Learning and Data Science Interview is a business whose own site puts it this way: "Real data science and machine learning interview questions and answers from ex-Meta Staff DS/ML Scientists. A/B, Stats, SQL, ML, Metrics, ML coding, Hands on, System design." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 4.4 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.4/10, MADInterview is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
What makes MAD interview better than its alternatives?
I created MAD as a side project out of my own frustration during transitioning from academia to industry and while preparing for interviews.
Why did you leave Meta?
Meta was my first industry role. I joined directly from academia as an IC6 Research Data Scientist (Applied Scientist) in the infrustructure org. My work was quite interesting: I was building ML algorithms for ranking Android code before it was shipped (as it happens, the order of the shipped code affects latency).
Why does it take so long to complete the platform?
I do this for fun, which means I don't work on it every day. My job is quite intense, and I have two young kids. At most, I find 4-5 hours a week to work on this. A challenging solution can take several hours to write up, so I end up adding a few new questions every week. The same goes for updating the front end or adding functionality on the platform.
How much money can I make as a PDS/DS/AS/MLE?
A lot. To get some ideas check on levels. Applied scientists and MLEs tend to make more than DS and PDS. In most cases, they make the same or more than SWEs. DS and PDS tend to make a little less. At Meta, Research Data Scientists were making 85%-90%% of SWE, whereas Product data scientists were making 65% of SWEs. In my current company, applied scientists are part of the Eng org, and make the same as SWEs.
Can I send you an interview question to get a solution? How can I contact you?
Absolutely. If you have seen an interview quwestion you are not certain about its solution (or you don't trust chatgpt) feel free to email me at [email protected]
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for MADInterview
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for MADInterview.
Scored by Engagemii on October 4, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/madinterview
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for MADInterview." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/madinterview
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform