AI Visibility Scorecard
marc.fail · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl marc.fail, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 1 times
Claude
#1,074,958 of 2,705,024 in Technology for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4.9/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
marc.fail describes itself simply: "marc.fail Notes on code, technology, caffeine and everything in between." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 4.9 out of 10.
Under the hood there is a sitemap and a readable heading structure and substantial page content, but the score is capped by what is missing: structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.9/10, marc.fail is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
What’s inside the acces log?
NGINX logs all the resources a client (by IP) is accessing as well as status code and user agent and some more information. That’s what every web server does by default. The thing is with log retention. By default, logrotate.d is set t keep logs for 52 days. As my webserver is not running for so long in the moment as I’m constantly changing things, I just have no Idea if that’s true. I’ll have to test it.
But how to do statistic with a log file?
After some googling, I found a tool called goaccess. It is a command line based log file analyzer. As a little bonus, it can generate a report html file, which presents the log file data in a nice gui instead within the command line.
What happened?
I was wondering what happend. I think something inescapable that happened to other things before, too: when something is really amazing, kind of exclusive (or at least expensive) and becomes ‘hip’, people will also get a taste for it or at least believe that it’s good, because everybody else of their peer group likes it. So you go there on the weekend to treat yourself maybe. Of course that’s amazing!
Woah, that sounds stupid, how did you moron fix it?
Good question! The solution was simple, using a submodule, but it took me a while to figure it out. I created another empty folder on my local machine and git clone’d the theme’s repo into it.
Okay, but how did you bring this separate repo to your weblog’s repo?
That was also easy. cd to the /themes/ folder of hugo and run git submodule add https://github.com/wortkrieg/ .git git submodule update
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for marc.fail
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for marc.fail.
Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/marc-fail
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for marc.fail." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/marc-fail
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform