AI Visibility Scorecard
mathematicalcrap.com · Education
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read BAD MATHEMATICS, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 5 times
Claude · Meta AI
#113,290 of 937,492 in Education for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.8/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
BAD MATHEMATICS is a business whose own site puts it this way: "But, assuming you wish to be here, this stupid homepage can be a bit of a guide to this stupid blog." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.8 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
On the page itself the strengths are clear: a clear heading structure. It is passable on a partly stated business identity, basic crawler access and partial sitemap and link coverage. What holds it back is structured data describing the business and credibility markers like credentials or reviews.
Away from its own site, other sites link to it. There is some, but not much, sign that the domain is only lightly established, there is little discussion of it and it barely surfaces on Reddit. Beyond that, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business and there is no press coverage to draw on.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.8/10, BAD MATHEMATICS has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Why The Blog?
Well, read the blog. But, probably the quickest explanations for why I bother are here and here and here.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for BAD MATHEMATICS
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for BAD MATHEMATICS.
Scored by Engagemii on August 2, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/mathematicalcrap
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for BAD MATHEMATICS." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/mathematicalcrap
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform