AI Visibility Scorecard
measuringthemind.com · Education
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Measuring the Mind, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · ChatGPT
#697,473 of 936,248 in Education for AI visibility
4
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4/10
0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
6
AI Adoption
iBasic · 6/100
from our crawl and measurement
Measuring the Mind works in Education. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 4.0 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4/10, Measuring the Mind is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Emotion and cognition: More similar than different?
View AbstractEmotions and cognitive processes have traditionally been viewed as separate domains. They have often been contrasted as hot vs. cold, automatic vs. controlled, evolutionarily primitive vs. advanced, and fast vs. slow. This distinction has fuelled dual-system theories, in which tendencies and biases are thought to be driven by emotions, which need to be overridden by higher-order cognitive processes.
Are Mental Disorders Natural Kinds?
View abstractThis paper examines whether mental disorders can be understood as natural kinds. I argue that, at least in a strong etiological sense, this assumption is difficult to sustain given the current state of psychiatric knowledge.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Measuring the Mind
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Measuring the Mind.
Scored by Engagemii on August 10, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/measuringthemind
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Measuring the Mind." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/measuringthemind
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform