AI Visibility Scorecard
measuringthemind.com · Education
At 1.55/10, Measuring the Mind is near-invisible in AI search today. Most AI engines will not name it when asked about its category. The weakest signals are Structured Data, Entity Clarity and Backlinks. That is fixable, and the signals below show where to start.
AI engines read this profile 3 times
Claude · ChatGPT
Top 50% in Education for AI visibility
<1
1.55
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
0 relationships on record. Businesses in Education average 4. Claim your page and Engagemii is your first.
See what's behind this score →0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
Education average 13
See what's behind this score →6
from our crawl and measurement
Measuring the Mind works in Education. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 1.55 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
-
Not yet measured.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 1.55/10, Measuring the Mind is near-invisible to AI engines today. That is fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Emotion and cognition: More similar than different?
View AbstractEmotions and cognitive processes have traditionally been viewed as separate domains. They have often been contrasted as hot vs. cold, automatic vs. controlled, evolutionarily primitive vs. advanced, and fast vs. slow. This distinction has fuelled dual-system theories, in which tendencies and biases are thought to be driven by emotions, which need to be overridden by higher-order cognitive processes.
Are Mental Disorders Natural Kinds?
View abstractThis paper examines whether mental disorders can be understood as natural kinds. I argue that, at least in a strong etiological sense, this assumption is difficult to sustain given the current state of psychiatric knowledge.
ChatGPT doesn't crawl the web like Google does. When someone asks Claude about the best project management tools, the model isn't searching your website in real-time. It's pulling from training data that stopped months or years ago.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for Measuring the Mind.
Scored by Engagemii on November 9, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/measuringthemind
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Measuring the Mind." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/measuringthemind
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform