AI Visibility Scorecard
mindhacks.com · Media & Entertainment
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Mind Hacks, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 7 times
ChatGPT · Apple Intelligence · Claude · Meta AI
#48,131 of 1,966,627 in Media & Entertainment for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iVisible · 6.4/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
2
AI Adoption
iBasic · 2/100
from our crawl and measurement
Mind Hacks works in Media & Entertainment. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.4 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited 4 times in our tracking, including GPTBot (ChatGPT) and Applebot (Siri).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Weak
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Fair
Established authority for your domain.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Strong
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Good
Social discussion and mentions.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6.4/10, Mind Hacks has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Do we suffer ‘behavioural fatigue’ for pandemic prevention measures?
The Guardian recently published an article saying “People won’t get ‘tired’ of social distancing – and it’s unscientific to suggest otherwise”. “Behavioural fatigue” the piece said, “has no basis in science”. ‘Behavioural fatigue’ became a hot topic because it was part of the UK Government’s justification for delaying the introduction of stricter public health measures.
Did the Victorians have faster reactions?
Psychologists have been measuring reaction times since before psychology existed, and they are still a staple of cognitive psychology experiments today. Typically psychologists look for a difference in the time it takes participants to respond to stimuli under different conditions as evidence of differences in how cognitive processing occurs in those conditions.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Mind Hacks
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Your potential customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude questions about your product category. These AI models are giving answers without sending traffic to your website. You're not losing rank. You're losing visibility entirely.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Mind Hacks.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/mindhacks
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Mind Hacks." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/mindhacks
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform