AI Visibility Scorecard
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl pDoom, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
Monitoring for AI engine activity
In the Engagemii AEO index
3
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 3.1/10
25
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 25/100
6
AI Adoption
iBasic · 6/100
from our crawl and measurement
pDoom describes itself simply: "Tracking AI existential risk. Auto-aggregated headlines. Human-curated analysis." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 3.1 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (WebSite), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Fair
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.1/10, pDoom is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
How Could AI Eliminate Humanity? A Failure-Mode Analysis of Civilizational Risk?
via ArXiv cs.AI [4] — This article develops a failure-mode framework for analyzing how advanced artificial intelligence could contribute to human extinction, irreversible civilizational collapse, or permanent human disempowerment. The central thesis is that catastrophic AI risk… Save Read Zac Boring a day ago Analysis
Why did we get warning shots?
via LessWrong AI [5] — substack.com/p/why-did-we-get-warning-shots?r=n2jpq&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=webI come from outside the EA / rationalist / LessWrong community. I would strongly prefer for AI to be a normal positive technology and to dismiss AI X-risk as a sci-fi… Save Read Zac Boring 2 days ago Industry
How to apply to AI safety fellowships (and beyond)?
via LessWrong AI [5] — About a year ago, I decided to go all-in on applying to AI safety fellowships, and around the end of 2025 I got into MATS. I think there's a small art to communicating your skills legibly. When I've spoken with others about how I answer application… Save Read Zac Boring 6 days ago Industry
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for pDoom
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for pDoom.
Scored by Engagemii on October 8, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/pdoom100
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for pDoom." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/pdoom100
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform