AI Visibility Scorecard
Evidence-Based Supplement Research
pillser.com · Healthcare
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Evidence-Based Supplement Research, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 12 times
Meta AI · Claude · Apple Intelligence · ShapBot
#7,042 of 924,420 in Healthcare for AI visibility
46
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.2/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
8
AI Adoption
iBasic · 8/100
About Evidence-Based Supplement Research
from our crawl and measurement
"Notable findings from the latest supplement and nutrition research, the most groundbreaking individual studies, in plain language, with the evidence caveats built in." That is how Evidence-Based Supplement Research of Boston, MA introduces itself. Its AI visibility score is 5.2 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (BreadcrumbList), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited 3 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic), Meta AI and Applebot (Siri).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Good
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Good
Social discussion and mentions.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.2/10, Evidence-Based Supplement Research has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Evidence-Based Supplement Research
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Evidence-Based Supplement Research.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/pillser
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Evidence-Based Supplement Research." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/pillser
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform