⚡ This is your brand? Claim your page FREE and bring it to life on AI search.

AI Visibility Scorecard

Places That Were

Name: Places That Were - AI Visibility Score
Creator: Engagemii
Published: 2026-07-31T18:10:03.709Z
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Unclaimed

placesthatwere.com · Education

Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Places That Were, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.

Claim this page free See the breakdown

AI engines read this profile 2 times

Claude

#98,323 of 895,750 in Education for AI visibility

AEO Visibility

Visible · 6/10

Muse Index Score

AI agent readiness

Basic · 5/100

AI Adoption

None detected · 0/100

About Places That Were

from our crawl and measurement

"Places That Were Every abandoned place has a story." That is how Places That Were introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.0 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.

Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.

AI crawlers have visited 2 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).

Industry · Education

Last scored · Jul 31, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Higher is better · 0-10

Structured Data

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Established authority for your domain.

Reference Presence

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

No press coverage found yet.

Community

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Social discussion and mentions.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6/10, Places That Were has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Places That Were

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Password (8+ characters)

Already have an account? Sign in

From the blog

Which AI is actually reading your website?→Why your brand doesn't show up in ChatGPT answers→The complete AEO checklist for small business→What is AEO? The beginner's guide→See all posts→

Picked for Places That Were: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Places That Were.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/placesthatwere

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Places That Were." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/placesthatwere

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.