AI Visibility Scorecard
planninglib.com · Technology
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read PlanningLib, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 2 times
Claude · Meta AI
#566,368 of 2,705,352 in Technology for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.3/10
75
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Transactable · 75/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
"PlanningLib est la plateforme gratuite de prise de rendez-vous en ligne pour les autoentrepreneurs et PME." That is how PlanningLib introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.3 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Strong
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.3/10, PlanningLib has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Why PlanningLib over others?
PlanningLibOthersFree to start✓✕0% commission✓✕24/7 online booking✓✓9 EUR/month incl. tax (cheapest)✓✕Automatic reminders✓✓Promo codes + gift cards✓✕Automatic balance payment✓✕Multi-staff management✓✓Dynamic pricing✓✕Automatic refunds✓✕Loyalty program✓✓Embeddable website widget✓✕Consultation forms + signature✓✕Automatic waitlist✓✕Reviews + Google routing✓✓Electronic invoicing (PDF)✓✕Referral program✓✕How it works
Pas encore prêt à vous lancer ?
Recevez nos conseils pour mieux gérer vos rendez-vous (1 email/semaine max).Recevoir les conseilsCalculateur ROI
Combien vous coûte la gestion manuelle ?
Estimez en 30 secondes ce que vous perdez chaque mois — et ce que PlanningLib vous ferait économiser.Rendez-vous par semaine20 RDV5 RDV50 RDVTemps pour confirmer / rappeler un RDV15 min5 min30 minTaux d'absence (no-show)10 %0 %30 %Votre tarif horaire estimé40 €/h20 €/h100 €/hHeures perdues / mois21.6 hCoût mensuel866 €Manque à gagner absences87 €Total économisé / mois953 €Avec PlanningLib, vos rappels et.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for PlanningLib
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for PlanningLib.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/planninglib
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for PlanningLib." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/planninglib
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform