AI Visibility Scorecard
quitforgood.net · Health & Wellness
At 1.8/10, Quit For Good is close to invisible in AI search today. Most assistants will not cite it when asked about your category - fixable, and the signals below show exactly where to start.
AI engines read this profile 4 times
ChatGPT · Claude
#318,154 of 380,264 in Health & Wellness for AI visibility
0
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 0/100
More likely to be named than 17% of Health & Wellness companies
2
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 1.8/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
"Expert addiction therapy and support for overcoming alcohol, drug, and gambling dependencies. Personalized treatment plans by David Keene to help you achieve lasting recovery." That is how Quit For Good introduces itself. As far as answer engines are concerned it may as well not exist yet: 1.8 out of 10.
On its own pages the site does well on a clear heading structure and crawler access and the files AI engines look for. It is passable on a partly stated business identity and partial sitemap and link coverage. What holds it back is structured data describing the business and credibility markers like credentials or reviews.
Off the page, almost no other sites link to it, the domain does not yet read as established, AI engines do not yet recognise it as a distinct business, there is no press coverage to draw on, nobody is discussing it where AI engines look and it does not come up on Reddit. None of that can be fixed on the page: it has to be earned.
The site links to no social profiles, so there is nothing tying the brand to a wider presence.
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 1.8/10, Quit For Good is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Quit For Good
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
ChatGPT doesn't crawl the web like Google does. When someone asks Claude about the best project management tools, the model isn't searching your website in real-time. It's pulling from training data that stopped months or years ago.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Quit For Good.
Scored by Engagemii on July 31, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/quitforgood-net
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Quit For Good." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/quitforgood-net
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform