AI visibility score
5.7/ 10Fair

▲ 0.7 since Jun 2026

#79,871 of 792,589 in Finance & Insurance

As of 2026-08-09 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

A Range of Reasonable Responses

A Range of Reasonable Responses

Unclaimed

rangeofreasonableresponses.com · Finance & Insurance

Somewhat visible. AI bots can read A Range of Reasonable Responses, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.

AI engines read this profile 7 times

Claude · Meta AI · ChatGPT

#79,871 of 792,589 in Finance & Insurance for AI visibility

6

AEO Visibility

i

Borderline · 5.7/10

5

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Basic · 5/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About A Range of Reasonable Responses

from our crawl and measurement

A Range of Reasonable Responses describes itself simply: "A Range of Reasonable Responses A balanced approach to UK employment law Skip to content HomeDarren Newman ← Older posts Is the government serious about guaranteed hours?." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.7 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.

Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.

AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).

Industry · Finance & Insurance
Last scored · Aug 9, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Strong

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Good

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Weak

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Good

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Good

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Strong

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Weak

Little domain authority yet.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.7/10, A Range of Reasonable Responses has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who does the right apply to?

The right to guaranteed hours does not just apply to zero-hours workers. The Act allows regulations to set a threshold of guaranteed hours per week above which the right will not apply.

Is this actually going to happen?

My theory remains that this will never in fact come into force. The current consultation ends in August this year.

A new test of fairness?

The consultation basically offers up two options for considertation. Option 1 would introduce a new test of fairness that would apply to all dismissals of protected employees. This would be a stricter standard than the current test of reasonableness. Here is what the Government suggests under this option: 35.

Limiting the reasons for dismissal?

There is a much more detailed discussion of Option 2 – but mainly to point out what a bad idea it is. Option 2 is expressed as narrowing the scope for dismissal or ‘removing some of the fair dismissal reasons’. This refers to what are generally known as the ‘potentially fair reasons for dismissal’ set out in S.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

What is this all for?

The truth is I just don’t understand what the Government is trying to achieve by changing the law.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for A Range of Reasonable Responses

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for A Range of Reasonable Responses: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for A Range of Reasonable Responses.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 9, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/rangeofreasonableresponses

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for A Range of Reasonable Responses." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/rangeofreasonableresponses

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform