⚡ This is your brand? Claim your page FREE and bring it to life on AI search.
AI Visibility Scorecard
readingminds.ai · Technology
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read ReadingMinds.AI, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 10 times
Meta AI · Claude · Apple Intelligence
#181,040 of 2,657,826 in Technology for AI visibility
6
AEO Visibility
iVisible · 6.1/10
90
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Transactable · 90/100
8
AI Adoption
iBasic · 8/100
from our crawl and measurement
ReadingMinds.AI, based in Clearwater, FL, describes itself simply: "ReadingMinds.AI is an AI-powered marketing research platform that turns real customer conversations into fast, actionable insights." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 6.0 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap.
AI crawlers have visited 5 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic), Applebot (Siri) and Meta AI.
Higher is better · 0-10
Structured Data
8
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
10
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
7
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
4
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
10
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
8
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
1
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
3
Established authority for your domain.
Reference Presence
0
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
5
Press and news coverage.
Community
0
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
0
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 6.1/10, ReadingMinds.AI has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
What is ReadingMinds?
ReadingMinds is an AI-native voice interview platform that replaces surveys with short voice conversations. Emma, the AI interviewer, detects six emotions at intensity 1-9 per conversational turn and delivers cited, quote-backed insights in hours instead of weeks.
How long does a typical AI voice interview last?
Interviews are short, typically 5 to 15 minutes, with an average around 10 minutes. Emma adapts in real time and asks follow-ups when she senses there is more to dig into.
How quickly can ReadingMinds deliver insights?
Hours, not weeks. You can launch a study in the morning and often have actionable insights within 48 hours. Emma runs interviews in parallel and the platform auto-codes themes, emotion signals, and cited quotes as results come in.
Does ReadingMinds store voice recordings?
No permanent recordings are stored. Audio is processed in real time for transcription and expression signal extraction, and only transcripts and derived expression and sentiment signals are retained under your chosen retention policy. No voiceprints or biometric identifiers are generated.
What expression patterns does ReadingMinds tag?
Six expression labels: Sad, Angry, Confrontational, Neutral, Cheerful, and Enthusiastic. Each is scored 1 to 9 for intensity on every conversational turn, producing the ReadingMinds Expression Fingerprint. These labels describe how a response is expressed in the conversation, not what a person privately feels.
How much does ReadingMinds cost?
Pricing is by interview volume. Free plan: 10 interviews per month, no credit card. Launch: $399/month for 200 interviews. Pilot: $899/month for 600 interviews. Enterprise: custom volume with SSO, compliance, and dedicated success management.
Are prospects and customers willing to talk to an AI interviewer?
Yes. Completion rates typically run above 90%, compared with roughly 15% for traditional surveys. 93 to 97% of participants say the AI experience feels as good as or better than a human moderator, and people often open up more because an AI will not judge or rush them.
What is the ReadingMinds Live Test Drive?
A free 3-minute voice interview with Emma that anyone can run without signup. You choose a scenario, talk to Emma, and receive a cited PDF report showing the emotional signals she detected in your answers.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for ReadingMinds.AI
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Your potential customers are asking ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude questions about your product category. These AI models are giving answers without sending traffic to your website. You're not losing rank. You're losing visibility entirely.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for ReadingMinds.AI.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/readingminds-ai
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for ReadingMinds.AI." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/readingminds-ai
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform