AI visibility score
3.5/ 10Weak

#842,250 of 937,617 in Education

As of 2026-08-01 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →Live terminal →

AI Visibility Scorecard

Rounds

Rounds

Unclaimed

roundsems.com · Education

Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Rounds, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.

AI engines read this profile 1 times

Claude

#842,250 of 937,617 in Education for AI visibility

<1

AI Naming Predictability

i

Rarely named · <1/100

Top 71% of Education

4

AEO Visibility

i

Near-invisible · 3.5/10

0

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Not agent-ready · 0/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About Rounds

from our crawl and measurement

Rounds describes itself simply: "Free NREMT prep app built by working EMS instructors for the new exam." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 3.5 out of 10.

Under the hood there is a readable heading structure and substantial page content, but the score is capped by what is missing: structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file, a sitemap.

Industry · Education
Last scored · Aug 1, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Strong

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Weak

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Fair

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Fair

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Weak

No inbound links found yet.

Domain Authority

Weak

Little domain authority yet.

Reference Presence

Weak

Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Weak

No community discussion yet.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.5/10, Rounds is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Frequently Asked Questions

Got Questions?

Who writes the questions?Every question and explanation is written by working EMS instructors, the same people who teach students in classrooms and watch them sit for the NREMT every cycle.When does it launch?We're targeting launch later this year on iOS and Android.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Rounds

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Claim your page free

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Rounds: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Rounds.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/roundsems

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Rounds." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/roundsems

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform