AI Visibility Scorecard
Science for progress
science4progress.com · Education
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Science for progress, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 1 times
Claude
#566,670 of 936,248 in Education for AI visibility
4
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4.4/10
30
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 30/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Science for progress
from our crawl and measurement
Science for progress is a business whose own site puts it this way: "Érj el tartós eredményeket személyre szabott edzésprogrammal! Mester diplomás humánkineziológus személyi edző, tudományos alapon épülő edzések Budapesten." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 4.4 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Fair
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.4/10, Science for progress is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Miből választhatsz?
Segítek, hogy az edzés több legyen mint mozgás. Egy út amelyen erősebbé válsz, megtalálod önbizalmad és megvalósítod álmaid alakját.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Science for progress
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Science for progress.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on September 3, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/science4progress
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Science for progress." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/science4progress
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform