AI Visibility Scorecard
sharpestats
sharpestats.com · Technology
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read sharpestats, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 5 times
Meta AI · Claude
#667,156 of 2,705,907 in Technology for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.2/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About sharpestats
from our crawl and measurement
sharpestats works in Technology. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.2 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Good
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Good
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Fair
Established authority for your domain.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.2/10, sharpestats has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Injuries in Baseball: How (Self-)Exciting?
Posted on November 6, 2022 Anyone can admit that baseball is hard to predict1, probably one of the reasons it can be so exciting. I’ve definitely done my share of modeling game and at-bat outcomes, but I wanted to pose a different challenge for this post: predicting injury risk. Injury risk is an important element... [Read More] Tags: MLB injury point process hawkes process poisson
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for sharpestats
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for sharpestats.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 2, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/sharpestats
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for sharpestats." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/sharpestats
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform