AI Visibility Scorecard
Society of Fellows in the Humanities
sofh.usc.edu · Education
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Society of Fellows in the Humanities, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 5 times
Meta AI · Claude
#22,146 of 937,490 in Education for AI visibility
3
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 3/100
More likely to be named than 93% of Education companies
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4.7/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Society of Fellows in the Humanities
from our crawl and measurement
Society of Fellows in the Humanities is a Los Angeles, CA business whose own site puts it this way: "Postdoctoral fellows are affiliated with the Society as well as with a USC department of their choice, and have faculty mentors in both." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 4.7 out of 10.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Good
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Good
Established authority for your domain.
Reference Presence
Strong
Recognized in AI knowledge graphs.
News & Press
Strong
Press and news coverage.
Community
Strong
Forum and community discussion.
Social Mentions
Strong
Social discussion and mentions.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4.7/10, Society of Fellows in the Humanities is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Society of Fellows in the Humanities
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Society of Fellows in the Humanities.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/sofh-usc-edu
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Society of Fellows in the Humanities." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/sofh-usc-edu
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform