AI Visibility Scorecard
Study 329
study329.org · Healthcare
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Study 329, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 4 times
Meta AI · Claude · Apple Intelligence
#188,492 of 921,522 in Healthcare for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.4/10
5
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 5/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About Study 329
from our crawl and measurement
Study 329 describes itself simply: "Neither doctors nor parents had the information they needed, and the FDA only reluctantly issued the appropriate warnings, as might be expected from a regulator that has corporate." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.4 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business and an llms.txt file.
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.4/10, Study 329 has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Legal Settlements Merely a Marketing Cost?
In 2004, New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer filed a consumer fraud action against GSK for mismatches between their marketing claims and the data. This lawsuit was settled the same year for $2.5 million. The terms of the settlement included a requirement for GSK to post study results on the company website, including those for Study 329.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Study 329
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Study 329.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/study329-org
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Study 329." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/study329-org
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform