AI Visibility Scorecard
SWT
swt-bench.com · Technology
At 2.17/10, SWT is near-invisible in AI search today. Most AI engines will not name it when asked about its category. The weakest signals are Structured Data, E-E-A-T Signals and Backlinks. That is fixable, and the signals below show where to start.
AI engines read this profile 3 times
Claude
Top 25% in Technology for AI visibility
19
AI Naming Predictability
iRarely named · 19/100
Technology average 28
Top 49% of Technology
See what's behind this score →2.17
-
Network Authority
iNot connected yet
0 relationships on record. Businesses in Technology average 4. Claim your page and Engagemii is your first.
See what's behind this score →0
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Not agent-ready · 0/100
Technology average 17
See what's behind this score →8
About SWT
from our crawl and measurement
SWT describes itself simply: "Check out the SWT-Bench leaderboard! SWT-Bench assess the capabilities of LLMs and Code Agents to generate unit tests for real-world issues, developed by ETH Zurich and LogicStar AI." When AI engines look at it, they find little to work with. It scores 2.17 out of 10.
Our crawl found a readable heading structure. It is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.
AI crawlers have read this profile 3 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
- Company ·
- SWT
- Website ·
- swt-bench.com
- Industry ·
- Technology
- Site status ·
- Live (The website showed an active business site when last checked (Nov 1, 2026).)
- Last scored ·
- Nov 9, 2026
The 6 on-page signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Weak
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Fair
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
The 6 off-page signals AI reads
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
-
Not yet measured.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) can read your site and name it in answers. At 2.17/10, SWT is near-invisible to AI engines today. That is fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the task in SWT-Bench?
Generate software tests which reproduce user-reported issues and increase code coverage. Each SWT-Bench task is based on a real-world pull-request from a GitHub repository which resolves a user-reported issue and contains the code patch fixing the issue and unit tests testing the fix. Given the original state of the code base and the user issue, the task is to generate tests that reproduce this issue.
What metrics do you measure?
We measure whether the generated tests reproduce the user issue and increase the code coverage of the modified code. For a generated test to reproduce the described issue, it should fail on original code base but pass after the code patch fixing the issue is applied. We call this a Fail-to-Pass (F2P) test.
What is the value of test generation?
Reproducing test can aide test-driven development, avoid regression, and are a powerful tool to cross-validate proposed bug fixes. To resolve a reported issues reliably, it is essential to first reproduce it and then confirm that a proposed bug fix actually addresses it. This is typically done by creating a reproducing test.
Are there other relevant benchmarks about code generation and testing?
SWE-bench measures the capability of fixing reported user issues. BaxBench measures capabilities at writing correct and secure web backends. SWE-bench: SWT-Bench and SWE-bench are based on the same GitHub repositories and issues. While SWT-Bench measures the ability of models or agents to reproduce a given issue, SWE-bench measures their ability to resolve it.
Why your brand doesn't show up in ChatGPT answers (and how to fix it)
ChatGPT doesn't crawl the web like Google does. When someone asks Claude about the best project management tools, the model isn't searching your website in real-time. It's pulling from training data that stopped months or years ago.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalSign up free to read the full article and get your AEO fix list for SWT.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on November 9, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/swt-bench
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for SWT." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/swt-bench
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform