AI Visibility Scorecard
texting.io
texting.io · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl texting.io, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 14 times
Claude · Meta AI · Apple Intelligence · ShapBot
#659,618 of 2,706,767 in Technology for AI visibility
12
AI Naming Predictability
iNamed occasionally · 12/100
More likely to be named than 94% of Technology companies
4
AEO Visibility
iNear-invisible · 3.8/10
25
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 25/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
About texting.io
from our crawl and measurement
texting.io describes itself simply: "Reach all of your customers in just a few clicks with our easy-to-use mass texting service. Send bulk SMS promotions, important reminders and more. Free Trial available." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 3.8 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, WebSite, WebPage), a sitemap and a readable heading structure. It is missing an llms.txt file.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
The 6 signals AI reads
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Fair
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Good
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
Off-page authority
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Strong
Inbound links from other sites.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
What this score means
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 3.8/10, texting.io is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Industries Can Benefit the Most from Using Mass Texting Software?
All organizations which have a need to communicate at scale can benefit greatly from using mass texts. Some examples are: Dentists Doctors Lawyers Restaurants/Fast Food Political Campaigns Churches Chiropractors Tutors Real Estate Professionals Nonprofits Schools Landscapers Personal Trainers Plumbers Gyms Spas
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for texting.io
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for texting.io.
Source & Attribution
Scored by Engagemii on August 8, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/texting-io
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for texting.io." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/texting-io
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform